Compare and differentiate Maoism and Stalinism Term Paper

Compare and differentiate monoamine oxidaseism and Stalinism - Term Paper ExampleThe peasants and workers formed the revolutionary classes under this public opinion. Marxism-Leninism is a globally inclined ideology that was of the belief that the communist revolution was inevitable. It further advocated that once the revolution had happened in one country, then others will soon have their own revolutions. Thus, it was the duty of believers of Marxism-Leninism to try to exporting the revolution. Both Stalin and Mao tried to implement Marxism-Leninism in their countries albeit with some modifications to suit their present situations and personal convictions. The two leaders implemented Five Year Plans in their countries in order to spur germinatement. Stalins First Five Year Plan (FFYP) begun early in 1926. His major focus was to transform the Soviet trades union from an agrarian economy to a prominent industrial power. He argued that rapid industrialization was critical for the So viet Union to flourish and survive as a world power. Stalins FFYP was presented as a second gear Revolution and this helped him to mobilize the peasants as they perceived themselves to be in a class war with their prior oppressors (Keefe, 2009). Rather than follow Marxism-Leninism, the FFYP was a revolution from above not from the masses. Stalin created a highly centralized command economy under the auspices of the State supply Committee (Gosplan). The communist tenet of equality was disregarded as Stalin gave incentives to Managers and skilled workers. It should be noted that the FFYP put heavy emphasis on the heavy industriousness as massive resources were put in place to develop the oil and steel industry. Maos began implementing his First Five Year Plan (FFYP) in 1953. According to Friedman (2001), Maos core goal was to end Chinese dependency on agriculture and transform the country into an industrialized economy. Maos plan was very similar to Stalins since it also advocated for rapid industrialization so as to make China a world power. The Chinese relied on the assistance of the Russians both economically and technically. Mao reorganized his administration to reduce bureaucracy and increase the countrys constancy force. This move was aimed at step-down the chances of derailing progress due to a long chain of command. The peasants were required to diversify from agriculture to industrial work. Although the effectiveness of the First Five Year Plans for both leaders was questionable, they nevertheless went ahead to launch their Second Five Year Plans (SFYP). Stalin implemented his SFYP beginning 1933. This plan utilized the industries built during the previous plan to increase productivity. The Second Five Year Plan gave more attention to consumer goods unlike its predecessor. In retrospect, this plan was much more realistic and achieved considerably better results. After Maos FFYP, he implemented a much more audacious policy in the Second Five Year Pl an. Mao believed that China would develop more rapidly if all resources were used to develop both industry and the agricultural sector concurrently. He utilized the countrys cheap labor to provide services primarily to the grain and steel industry. However, poor workmanship resulted in the failure of the steel production projects. The steel plants were poorly planned and there was scarcity of qualified engineers to oversee the work (Mark, 2001). In order to reign on the agricultural sector, both Stalin and Mao implemented the policy of Collectivization. Under Stalin,